Tammy Bruce: Tolerance

.
As quoted by the California Patriot, the conservative alternative nespaper on the Berkeley Campus, [Graduate Assembly President Jessica] Quindel is a gold-plated example of moral relativism:  “Quindel, a self-avowed hater of the American Flag, the federal government, and the ‘Star-Spangled Banner,’ said she is still patriotic.  ‘It depends on your definition of patriotism.  Everyone has a different definition.’” [19]
     There is no solid ground beneath Ms. Quindel and so many others conditioned by leftists in the academy.  There is no sense of pride, guilt, or shame.  Everything is relative.  Nothing is definitive.  Nihilism rules the day.  Welcome to the World behind the Looking Glass.
     John Leo, in his column for
U.S. News & World Report, tells how this growing inability to see right and wrong and to judge immoral acts leaves students confused about even the most obvious of depravities.  Leo wrote:  “Several years ago a college professor in upstate New York reported that 10 percent to 20 percent of his students could not bring themselves to criticize the Nazi extermination of Europe’s Jews.  Some students expressed personal distaste for what the Nazis did.  But they were not willing to say that the Nazis were wrong, since no culture can be judged from the outside and no individual can challenge the moral worldview of another.” [20]
     Odd, isn’t it?  These “postmodernists,” as Leo terms them, pontificate about how every culture should be taken on its own terms and claim that no judgment can be exercised about terrorists or terrorist nations.  They even manifest an inability to condemn one of the most depraved acts of the 20th century — the Holocaust.  And yet, these same people, who have been so warped they think Hitler’s inner child should be understood, have rallies and marches
condemning the United States.  Of course, the double standard shouldn’t be too surprising.  Moral relativism acts as a terrific fig leaf for the Left Elite’s hatred of this country and desire for its destruction.
     We’ve heard things from “peace” activists essentially demanding that we try to understand bin Laden’s (and Arafat’s, and every other terrorist’s) personal pain and have respect and tolerance for Radical Islamists’ frustration at being “oppressed peoples.”  If this attitude prevails, we will end up “tolerating” ourselves to death, and will condemn Western civilization — which, it is safe to say, is the most progressive and greatest civilization on Earth — to a very compassionate dustbin.

[19]  Steve Sexton, “School Sponsored 911 Rememberence Day to Exclude Patriotic Symbols and Religious References,” California Patriot, 6 September 2002.  http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printable.asp?ID=2783

[20]  John Leo, “Professors Who See No Evil,” U.S. News & World Report (July 22, 2002).

Tammy Bruce
Chapter Six, “A Weapon in the Hands of the Left:  The Real Agenda of the Academic Elite”
The Death of Right and Wrong

7 Responses to “Tammy Bruce: Tolerance”

  1. Count Mazz Says:

    I have three points:

    (1) A patriot is a person who loves, supports, and defends his/her country.

    If you don’t love an America that provides you with unbounded opportunities to succeed, if you don’t defend American traditions from those who seek to redefine our Constitution, and if you don’t value American ideas about freedom and justice above the ideas of other countries/cultures, then you’re not patriotic– it’s really that simple. Liberals walk a fine line between patriotism and treason.

    (2) Human beings who adhere to a moral code are well within their rights to judge other people and other cultures as wrong, or even evil.

    Naziism is evil. Communism is evil. Terrorism is evil. There are no exceptions to these.

    And just because a person has a motive for doing something evil doesn’t mean that he isn’t evil for making his decision. (The 9/11 hijackers are a great example.) Good things can be justified, but bad things can also be justified. Justification is not a measure of morality. i.e. Providing a reason for making a wrong choice doesn’t negate the fact that the choice was wrong. It’s surprising to me how easy it usually is to justify doing something that’s wrong. That doesn’t mean that it isn’t wrong– it just means that the decision was made easier because the person had a reason to do it.

    (3) If you can’t classify America as a good and righteous country and Naziism as an evil, repulsive doctrine, then you have no idea what good and evil are.

    If organized religion can teach us one thing, it’s that human beings do not know good and evil by their nature. It is only by believing in and/or showing loyalty to some form of higher authority — God, country, family — that a person comes to know what is right and what is wrong.

    Sorry, guys, but “following your heart” isn’t good enough. Because when you are faced with a genuine crisis, you’re more likely to make a decision that is reckless, comfortable, better for you in the short-term, and/or selfish by using your emotions, whereas you’re more likely to make a decision that is wiser, temporarily uncomfortable, better for you in the long-term, and/or beneficial to those around you by using the philosophy that you live by.

  2. matt Says:

    Well i think humans are naturally altruistic and good by nature. I think we are then currupted by our envirment. But in a time of crisis the vast majority of us will almost instinctually take care of eachother.

  3. Count Mazz Says:

    I see no reason to believe that humans are either good or evil by nature. It is our choices over the course of our lives, indeed influenced by our environment, which define us as one or the other.

    In a time of crisis, we instinctually take care of ourselves as individuals, unless we’ve been taught — or trained ourselves — to do otherwise.

  4. matt Says:

    Well I’m not sure about that. I mean you see during times like Katrina or during September eleventh huge amount of aid pour in from the rest of the nation. After the twin towers fell people poured into the blood banks to donate. Fireman and the police force went above and beyond the call of duty to help there fellow Americans. During Katrina hundreds of volunteers went down to rebuild houses. When people need help others will be there for them. Yes there are a few greedy people out there but for the most part I think we find it instinctual to help others. I think this comes from the fact that god created us and in our creation we were born with not just the capabilities but the desire to love. No one thinks of themselves as evil and I can’t imagine where feelings such as guilt or remorse come from if not out of shame for not acting lovingly. I mean if we were just to think coldly and practically it would make sense just to take care of yourself and you wouldn’t feel guilt over murder if it was beneficial to you however it is rare that you find someone who doesn’t feel remorse over actions such as those. Why? It can’t come simply from being taught since logic would tell you it’s simply survival of the fittest. Why does emotion get in our way? I think it’s because of love and the fact that humans are naturally loving as God intended us to be. It can only be through getting away from Gods love that we find ourselves behaving despicably and even then we feel badly because it is natural for us to enjoy being loving. Not to love hurts us in the form of guilt even if we don’t think of it like that. When you hurt others you are hurting yourself as it is against your nature.

  5. Count Mazz Says:

    I’m willing to concede that men are born with a conscience– that they have always possessed and will always possess an inherent knowledge of what they should do when they’re faced with a question of morality, but I won’t go so far as to say that they are “altruistic” or “good” by nature.

    Some people are willing to risk or even sacrifice their lives; others are unwilling to do so. Many people ran towards the Twin Towers as they burned; still, many others ran away from the scene. Amidst the true carnage, as people are hurting or dying, the hero types are almost always in the minority. Days and weeks later, after people have covered their own asses, they tend to be a lot more generous. So I won’t give human nature the benefit of the doubt.

    I also hesitate to say that human beings are “loving” by nature. But I’ll have to think more about that one.

  6. matt Says:

    I think the fact that we have a concence is proof that we are inclined to be good. Circumstances may teach us to ignore our good nature but that is corruption. To be corrupted you must at one point been innocent. Our nature still rejects those bad actions despite bieng corrupted via guilt. This guilt showes that we want to be good because its our nature to be good. This is not to say that we ARE all godd but that our nature is to be good. This is corrupted due to our culture not the other way around.

  7. matt Says:

    tehn again i must admit that i might be slightly nyeve. For the most part ive only met basicly good people. At 15 we tend not to be out meeting murderers which might color my views slightly

Comments are closed.